Git tips#

Rebasing on main#

This updates your feature branch with changes from the upstream SciPy github repo. If you do not absolutely need to do this, try to avoid doing it, except perhaps when you are finished. The first step will be to update the remote repository with new commits from upstream:

git fetch upstream

Next, you need to update the feature branch:

# go to the feature branch
git checkout my-new-feature
# make a backup in case you mess up
git branch tmp my-new-feature
# rebase on upstream main branch
git rebase upstream/main

If you have made changes to files that have changed also upstream, this may generate merge conflicts that you need to resolve. See below for help in this case.

Finally, remove the backup branch upon a successful rebase:

git branch -D tmp

Note

Rebasing on main is preferred over merging upstream back to your branch. Using git merge and git pull is discouraged when working on feature branches.

Recovering from mess-ups#

Sometimes, you mess up merges or rebases. Luckily, in Git it is relatively straightforward to recover from such mistakes.

If you mess up during a rebase:

git rebase --abort

If you notice you messed up after the rebase:

# reset branch back to the saved point
git reset --hard tmp

If you forgot to make a backup branch:

# look at the reflog of the branch
git reflog show my-feature-branch

8630830 my-feature-branch@{0}: commit: BUG: io: close file handles immediately
278dd2a my-feature-branch@{1}: rebase finished: refs/heads/my-feature-branch onto 11ee694744f2552d
26aa21a my-feature-branch@{2}: commit: BUG: lib: make seek_gzip_factory not leak gzip obj
...

# reset the branch to where it was before the botched rebase
git reset --hard my-feature-branch@{2}

If you didn’t actually mess up but there are merge conflicts, you need to resolve those. This can be one of the trickier things to get right. For a good description of how to do this, see this article on merging conflicts.

Rewriting commit history#

Note

Do this only for your own feature branches.

There’s an embarrassing typo in a commit you made? Or perhaps the you made several false starts you would like the posterity not to see.

This can be done via interactive rebasing.

Suppose that the commit history looks like this:

git log --oneline
eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs
a815645 Modify it so that it works
2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
13d7934 First implementation
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant
29001ed Add pre-nep for a copule of structured_array_extensions.
...

and 6ad92e5 is the last commit in the main branch. Suppose we want to make the following changes:

Rewrite the commit message for 13d7934 to something more sensible.
Combine the commits 2dec1ac, a815645, eadc391 into a single one.

We do as follows:

# make a backup of the current state
git branch tmp HEAD
# interactive rebase
git rebase -i 6ad92e5

This will open an editor with the following text in it:

pick 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
pick a815645 Modify it so that it works
pick eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs

# Rebase 6ad92e5..eadc391 onto 6ad92e5
#
# Commands:
#  p, pick = use commit
#  r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message
#  e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending
#  s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit
#  f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message
#
# If you remove a line here THAT COMMIT WILL BE LOST.
# However, if you remove everything, the rebase will be aborted.
#

To achieve what we want, we will make the following changes to it:

r 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
f a815645 Modify it so that it works
f eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs

This means that (i) we want to edit the commit message for 13d7934, and (ii) collapse the last three commits into one. Now we save and quit the editor.

Git will then immediately bring up an editor for editing the commit message. After revising it, we get the output:

[detached HEAD 721fc64] FOO: First implementation
 2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
[detached HEAD 0f22701] Fix a few bugs + disable
 1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/my-feature-branch.

and the history looks now like this:

0f22701 Fix a few bugs + disable
721fc64 ENH: Sophisticated feature
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant

If it went wrong, recovery is again possible as explained above.

Deleting a branch on github #

git checkout main
# delete branch locally
git branch -D my-unwanted-branch
# delete branch on GitHub
git push origin :my-unwanted-branch

(Note the colon : before test-branch. See also: guides/remove-a-remote-branch

Exploring your repository#

To see a graphical representation of the repository branches and commits:

gitk --all

To see a linear list of commits for this branch:

git log

You can also look at the network graph visualizer for your github repo.

Backporting#

Backporting is the process of copying new feature/fixes committed in scipy/main back to stable release branches. To do this you make a branch off the branch you are backporting to, cherry pick the commits you want from scipy/main, and then submit a pull request for the branch containing the backport.

First, you need to make the branch you will work on. This needs to be based on the older version of SciPy (not main):

# Make a new branch based on scipy/maintenance/1.8.x,
# backport-3324 is our new name for the branch.
git checkout -b backport-3324 upstream/maintenance/1.8.x

Now you need to apply the changes from main to this branch using git cherry-pick:

# Update remote
git fetch upstream
# Check the commit log for commits to cherry pick
git log upstream/main
# This pull request included commits aa7a047 to c098283 (inclusive)
# so you use the .. syntax (for a range of commits), the ^ makes the
# range inclusive.
git cherry-pick aa7a047^..c098283
...
# Fix any conflicts, then if needed:
git cherry-pick --continue

You might run into some conflicts cherry picking here. These are resolved the same way as merge/rebase conflicts. Except here you can use git blame to see the difference between main and the backported branch to make sure nothing gets screwed up.
Push the new branch to your Github repository:
```
git push -u origin backport-3324
```
Finally make a pull request using Github. Make sure it is against the maintenance branch and not main, Github will usually suggest you make the pull request against main.

Pushing changes to the main repo#

This is only relevant if you have commit rights to the main SciPy repo.

When you have a set of “ready” changes in a feature branch ready for SciPy’s main or maintenance branches, you can push them to upstream as follows:

First, merge or rebase on the target branch.
1. Only a few, unrelated commits then prefer rebasing:
```
git fetch upstream
git rebase upstream/main
```
  See Rebasing on main.
2. If all of the commits are related, create a merge commit:
```
git fetch upstream
git merge --no-ff upstream/main
```

Check that what you are going to push looks sensible:

git log -p upstream/main..
git log --oneline --graph

Push to upstream:

git push upstream my-feature-branch:main

Note

It’s usually a good idea to use the -n flag to git push to check first that you’re about to push the changes you want to the place you want.

Git tips#

Rebasing on main#

Recovering from mess-ups#

Rewriting commit history#

Deleting a branch on github#

Several people sharing a single repository#

Exploring your repository#

Backporting#

Pushing changes to the main repo#

Deleting a branch on github #